It really pisses me off when people over on L.T. use the "review" field to put in a "blurb" or less, and yet that ends up counting as much as a 600-word essay in the "most prolific reviewers" listing! And, that's not the worst of it ... I mean it's bad enough when the so-called review is as minimal as "not his best", but it pisses me off to see (as I did last night) a "review" of "not yet read". I want to beat these people in the face with a 2x4! Grrrrrrr ...
